By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
I , & most of my retired friends on Medicare do not have this insurance as it is expensive & also many that are on our Medicare supplement plans are dentists rhat are not in their network or that are a long distance to drive of which many of us no longer do.
Down the road, should you need this it will be costly to join because of the penalties.
Something to consider carefully.
Another thing I learned the hard way this year is that signing up for a Medadvantage program instead of a Medigap program can make it impossible later to get Medigap coverage ... so think carefully about the possible long-term consequences of doing this, too.
Medadvantage policies combine Part B and D into one policy, and they can be cheaper than pricing these separately. But what we found for my Dad is that there a breathtaking shortage of doctors in rural southern Oregon who are willing to accept new Medicare patients. Medadvantage policies constrict this number even further by including only a subset of regional doctors in their "network." This made getting access to doctors last year EXTREMELY hard for us, so I decided this year, I'd switch him back to "traditional" Medicare and get a Medigap policy and a part D policy instead, even though his monthly premium costs would go up. Turns out that only under very specific circumstances can you get a Medigap policy once you have elected to sign up for a Medadvantage policy ... if you choose to buy a Medigap policy right when you first become eligible for Medicare, the insurance companies are required to sell you the Medigap policy you choose, and not to deny you coverage due to pre-existing conditions. But unless you fall into one of the special circumstances I mentioned above, if you buy a Medadvantage policy first and try to switch later (i.e., during an annual "open enrollment period") to a Medigap policy, an insurance company can refuse to sell you Medigap coverage if you have a "pre-existing condition." My Dad has a diagnosed dementia now, which can be an expensive condition to treat ... so the odds that an insurance company would NOW be willing to sell him a Medigap policy are low.
Finding this out really upset me, because no one told us when we signed up for a Medadvantage policy that doing so could make it essentially impossible later to switch to a Medigap policy ... and the "access" to in-network doctors taking Medicare patients where my Dad lives are so bad. Worse, when we selected the Medadvantage policy he is on, we did so after first checking the plan's provider directory, and determining that there were some 30 available in-network "general providers" who, the plan claimed, where taking new Medicare patients. When we actually tried to schedule with these providers, though, we learned that a staggering number of them were not only NOT taking new Medicare patients, but had not done so for YEARS. So the "provider directory" turned out to have been a dangerous document to base our plan decision on.
Dad's primary care provider is now a family nurse practitioner, and apparently, a lot of elderly people on Medicare in the area where he lives have gone that route because there are so few MDs or DOs willing to see/treat them for the money Medicare pays. The whole thing is pretty scary, actually ... really makes me wonder how bad things will be by the time we get there ourselves. The new health care law will, on its face, improve coverage by making it possible for more people to qualify for coverage by insurance companies who won't be able to refuse to supply it based on previous conditions ... but as I have explained above, health care "coverage" does not equal health care "access." Doctors already do not and will not in the future have to take Medicare patients (and most cannot afford to take many) ... I imagine the same thing will apply to the sort of coverage the government is able to mandate that insurance companies provide. Medical tourism is a viable option only for those who are healthy or physicially non-frail enough to travel great distances. Scary ....
I would suggest investigating long term care insurance policies too.
Elizabeth