By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
If she is assessed to be of 'sound mind,' then I believe she is legally able to do what she wants.
If she is medically diagnosed to NOT be able to make decisions in her best interest - to have a form of dementia - however medical provider assesses / word this, then I believe you need to get legal authority to make decisions for her. It seems like most medical providers do not like to use the word 'dementia' although there is certainly is legal language that conveys what is needed for another to make decisions for a person who is unable to make them for themselves.
I see you mention she is not declared 'incompetent.' To me, this is your answer.
As well, you indicate that your sister is / was given primary health care surrogate and you the alternate.
If I were you, I would hire an attorney specializing in this area of elder law / trusts / POA etc. and/or ask your sister if she would go to a mediator with you, if you feel the situation has escalated to this point of needing an outside person, be it an attorney or mediator.
Gena / Touch Matters.
I believe OP’s sister has her reasons why this is not sustainable for her any longer even with more help brought in . We are not hearing her side of the situation . OP who is not there all the time really has no concept .
If OP was willing to move near Mom and manage this , ok . Any other scenario still leaves the sister to be the one to handle last minute lack of at home staffing issues , emergencies etc . Or even worse, the 30 year old son of OP who is living there having to do hands on care. The sister knows this , and that’s why she is not giving in on this deadlock. Good for her .
The POA issue is concerning. There should be a designated financial and medical POA. I highly recommend that you take your mother to two different neurologists to get formal opinions on her cognitive status and ability to make sound decisions about important financial and personal matters. I had to do that for my Dad, who sounds very much like your mother. We brought him under the guise of having “memory problems” in order to get him to go. Both doctors concurred that his dementia, while moderate, is severe enough to impair his judgement regarding important financial and major personal decisions. He is still living in his house, but those letters give me leverage as POA to make the decision to go to a facility for him if I feel we cannot make this living situation work any more. You simply can’t let your demented loved one or your heart make decisions that really require your head. If you have sufficient finances and the facility near your sister is a good one then you really should take advantage of that. I am dealing with two 90 + year olds at the same time so for financial reasons I need to make home care work for as long as possible. Otherwise, the joint cost for both would be about $17,000 per month!
We did this for years.
I think fredericd has to realise that the balance may be the mum's wishes against the sister's wellbeing. If a compromise, such as an increased care package, can help then that's great. Otherwise, I would say that the sister's health and wellbeing need to be prioritised now.
That's the trick - working out what the priority really is. We get caught up with misplaced guilt and a needless striving for perfection that is unattainable, when we really just need to accept the inevitable and go with "good enough".
This is what I'm dealing with and why I have given up on aiming for the best and learned to settle for whatever little wins I can get.
The district nurse spelled out for my stepfather, earlier this week, what I worked out some time ago: my mum is unlikely to last the year. I'm thinking it could be weeks, rather than months. Her COPD, dementia and lack of eating have all conspired to age Mum decades more than her 75 years.
The dilemma, to my mind, is how best to keep Mum comfortable. In her own home is preferable, but not if it becomes too difficult, either for her carers or for her wellbeing.
Her husband has been insisting that she walks between the living room, bathroom and bedroom of their tiny flat because if she loses all mobility, she will become bed-bound. That seems reasonable, on the face of it, except Mum is now extremely frail.
It's too late for exercise - he should have allowed me to make mum go for walks, get fitter, and prioritise rehabilitation after her stroke, 13 years ago. He wouldn't even allow me to teach Mum how to make a cup of tea, again.
(He became verbally aggressive with me for using my schoolteacher voice with Mum, but it was the only way to push her to do anything, including eating. In the end, though, I had to admit defeat and back off. I knew the end result would be Mum's mental and physical decline, but I wasn't next of kin and had no say over Mum's care.)
I pointed out to him, just yesterday, that not only is Mum in extreme pain, she's weak, struggling to breathe, and at risk of having a fall. Even with a carer by her side - I walk backwards, with Mum holding onto me for support, but he's insisting (control) that the carers just take Mum's arm as he does.
As long as she can take a couple of steps, get up and sit down - with assistance - there's no reason not to use the wheelchair between rooms so Mum doesn't fight for breath as much, or feel so much pain.
Soon, Mum won't be able to do anything, no matter what. She's already struggling to stay awake when her children and grandchildren visit. Little things, like cleaning her face makes her cry out.
The palliative team are on standby; they've been in contact and are at the end of a phone 24/7. End of life meds have already been prescribed and are waiting in a locked cabinet.
This morning, when I saw how much pain she was in, I thought that Mum would be better off in a care home. But it's about weighing her wishes - to stay with her husband - which will directly affect her emotional and mental wellbeing, with what's best for her physical care. So, I just have to keep chipping away, until my stepdad gets on board with prioritising Mum's comfort over keeping her mobile or any of the other unnecessary things he's insisting on. It's just too late now for any of that.
(Btw, I'm also concerned about his wellbeing, and I'm aware that he's been unable to accept what's happening to Mum. I'm angry with him, but I also care about him. Families, eh?)
The long trips were bad enough, but having your mum in your home means that you are her carer 24/7. It's unsustainable.
If she isn't already, have yor mum placed in the nicest facility possible. And don't feel guilty as you wave goodbye.
You need to prioritise your own wellbeing.
At 98, and still relatively stable with memory, her last years would be miserable during any minute of everyday that she has clarity.
Don't do that to her.
At this stage of her life, what other / more pleasure or security / enjoyment does she have?
What is your sister's reasoning for moving her?
How does your sister CONSIDER your mom's QUALITY of life vs keeping her alive? This is a conversation to have with your sister.
Perhaps you and your sister can agree that 'as her cognitive and physical functioning changes, you both will re-assess the situation. In other words, it isn't a 'done deal' or black/white decision. You (both) decide as needed. I am not clear on who actually has the 'authority' (legally) to make these determinations.
* It sounds like there aren't any security precautions in place at night - whichare needed such as a bell when the door opens, a lock on the door so she can't actually leave the house) ...
* I question how much her son (your sibling?) is doing -
* Sounds like she definitely needs someone else / more care in the evenings and/or during the night.
* There are mattresses with BELLS or something. It likely would only wake someone up who is also in the room with her.
* Also perhaps get a phone intercom or something so son / someone can hear what is gonig on in her room at / during the nights.
Gena / Touch Matters
This is not a sustainable option.
Yes, dementia may worsen in another setting (also, it might not) but a 98 year old's dementia is going to progress regardless.
I don't think that the aged mother's well-being is more important than her grandson's, nor her daughter's.
Once your mon needs help in navigating and executing her living situation, she needs to bow to the exigencies of the needs of others. The ball is no longer in her park.
Once we are no longer truly independent (i.e., we are being propped up by others) we need to take their needs into consideration.
2. If she has not been declared incompetent she can still make her own decisions.
3. It sounds like she is willing to have caregivers 24/7/365. It sounds like she has the funds to do so.
Personally I would arrange the caregivers 24/7 and let her remain in her home.
I think she would do better at home.
I think a move to Memory Care or even Assisted Living would cause a decline.
Assuming Mom stays home ….
Your burnt out sister is not obligated to help make this happen nor , manage mother’s care . She can step back from propping up the mother living at home , in all ways. She can refuse to do anything at all , Dr.appts , shopping, order meds , respond to emergencies etc .
Then either your mother , you or someone else, will have to set this up and manage her needs . Managing homecare from a distance can be very difficult, especially , doctor appts , emergencies.
Your mother’s “ decision “ to stay home requires help from other people . Mom is not independent . Others around her have the right to say they will not or can not help anymore , or it’s too difficult to manage at home . Often this is when the house of cards falls , and placement happens .
I’m not saying your sister would refuse to help entirely , but just an FYI she could . She could give up being primary healthcare surrogate .
one question - how does your sister/ or you, pay general bills and costs if no one has official power of attorney? I assume your Mom herself is not writing out checks etc? does the trust and trustee role / contract dictate that you can do this while she is still living?
So I'm wondering if a legal structure is now needed. Assuming at age 98 your mom would not be found to be competent to make decisions, that would mean (at least in my state as far as I know) someone applying to be guardian. With guardian status, one can fully call the shots legally then, including placing parent in a facility if guardian deems that needed, ......
I'm not a lawyer, but that is what I have gleaned from such situations being described as far as I know
When dementia and wandering sets in, it's no longer about what the elder wants or is "adamant" about, but what she needs to stay safe. I cared for a couple who suffered from dementia years ago, who were insistent on staying in their own home w/o 24/7 care. Their daughter agreed. Jim left the house one night at 2 am, fell in the street and laid there for hours until he was found and 911 was called. He died the next day of a subdural hematoma.
I think your sister gets to call the shots here since she is your mother's primary caregiver. You living far away means you do no hands on caring and are clueless about what your sister is going through. Unless you want to move to FL to take over moms 24/7 care, let sister handle this with either placement in Memory Care Assisted Living or by hiring 24/7 caregivers.
Unfortunately , very often the far away siblings are clueless about what it’s like , and side with the parent . The far away sibling wants to keep the parent happy .
The only impact the far away sibling has is phone calls listening to the parents complaints , wishes and wants .
That pales in comparison to the local sibling with boots on the ground.
Yes, the primary caregiver calls the shots .
At 98, any health care plan put in place won’t be a forever plan. Mom is in decline so things will of necessity need to be adjusted as the decline progresses.
Just my opinion but if you are going to object to sisters plan for moms health care, you should be willing to take it over.
I am in agreement based on the information given, that mom should not be forced into care at this point.
After all, patients “escape” from memory care as well, although with locked doors it is pretty rare.
But the idea that one such occurrence is reason for sis to want her moved, speaks to burn out and burn out is a real condition, very hard to come back from.
Seldom can it be fully appreciated or understood by those who have not had 24/7 responsibility of another’s life just how difficult it can be. And often the caregiver is in denial.
Another thing that I think many are surprised at is that the family responsibility doesn’t stop just because someone is in a facility.
My wish for your family would be that sis gets relief from the primary caregiver position and that mom remains at home with all the devices necessary to protect her. Cameras were a great help to me at one point. Good locks and a bit more supervision. UTI tests, medication assessment are also things to look into.
Let us know how things are going. We learn from one another. Try to partner with your sister to provide the best care possible for mom that also protects the caregivers. You might tell sister that you just aren’t ready yet regardless of all her best reasoning. Everyone involved should be heard.
I disagree. OP not being “ ready yet” is not a valid reason to keep the sister in servitude , which is what would happen . If OP “ took over “ OP would still be calling her with tasks to do because OP is not there .
We’ve had many people come here stuck in servitude because a sibling who is in charge that lives far away is “ not ready “.
It would be different if OP lived close by and could actually be available 24/7 to address issues .
It's Want vs Need.
It's level of freedom vs level of safety.
It's about choices & control.
The big factor is competence. Is your Mother competent to make the decision?
Can she understand & assess the safety risks, weigh the pros & cons, use reason & judgement?
Not always clear cut - -every family differs.
Eg 1. A Farmer has dug boots in. Wants to stay on his/her land. Is happy there. Copes alone, yet frail or ill. No home help, infrequent visitors, no close services. If falls down & cannot get to a phone.. is done for. Understands the risk. Still chooses to remain on the farm over an inside life in a care home.
Eg 2. Mr/s Homebody. States never moving from beloved home. Is happy there but needs much family help (or home services) to cope. When asked to problem solve, covers up & says "I'll manage" to everything. Choosing to remain in the home, or refusing non-family help, or refusing a fall alarm etc but lacks understanding of the consequences of that choice. Says "I will never fall". Lacks insight to their true level of care need.
May I suggest a trial.
In between Home & a Care Home can be 'Home with services'.
Like this;
A. Age in place at home, independantly
B. Age in place at home WITH services eg housecleaning meals, deliveries, medication management, aides for personal care, company or supervision, driving.
C. Care Home where all the services are onsite.
Choice B can be a lot of work. Like running an aged care home for one. It is not for everyone family, especially if not local. But it can be a done as a trial, to LENGTHEN the time at home.
Discuss with your Sister & Mother to see if this could work for your family.
PS Going out at night, alone? That is a real worry. Aim to remove that risk now before a tradegy strikes.
Sometimes we need to let nature take its course. One day my Mom had a very bad fall, 911 was called, she was hospitalized, then rehab, then skilled nursing home where she spend her final months.
Having my parents live in their 3 story home made me a nervous wreck as I could tell my folks had issues with falls. Every time the telephone rang and it was their Caller ID, I would go into sheer panic. They had stopped driving years prior, so I was their "wheels" and they were use to getting out of the house numerous times a day. Thank goodness for on-line grocery shopping where I could just put in an order and pick-up the next day. Mom would say the food "tasted funny" compared to inside the grocery store shopping.... (sigh). I wonder if this is what your sister is dealing with, thus her request for your Mom to move to senior living?
Your Mom’s wishes can be granted so long as it’s not too much of a burden on your sister who is responsible for handling your mother’s life .
Your mother is not independent . She relies heavily on others to keep her in her home. When this is no longer working for the family , Mom’s living situation changes.
Nobody needs to be burned out to grant an elders wishes. The caregivers life matters too . BTW most elders say they want to stay at home . Your mother is not aware of how much work this is on your sister . With dementia so far along that she wanders outside , Mom can not make this decision for your sister to continue managing Moms life at home . When the additional homecare help calls off sick are you going to come from WV to cover the shift ? Who has to respond to emergencies ? Your sister does .
Considering most of this is on your sister , if she is saying it’s too much managing this from 30 minutes away and she wants Mom in MC near her , I think your sister gets to make this decision . You aren’t in your sisters shoes and your Mom can’t recognize that this is a lot on her daughter . SISTER gets to SAY WHEN she’s has had enough of the current situation and place Mom . Your Mom is the one that needs help , she does not dictate your sisters life . Those that need help ( your mom ) are the ones who have to compromise . I think you should hear what your sister is saying and put yourself in her shoes .
I have read your reply through 3 times now. And I will read it again.
When MY health changes, MY life will be changed. I hope I retain the good sense to rise to that challenge. To adampt & CHANGE my life in accordance to my NEW needs. (Not expect others to change their lives so I can stay the same).
Once dementia is taking hold, the elder can no longer make decisions such as this.
Do some research on locks and doorknob locks, implement things that stop mom from exiting without help, it can be one layer to keep her safe.