By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
I do not think your sister should be allowed to declare herself as beneficiary of anything for which your mother has not already named a beneficiary.
I like Alva Deer's point that it would be highly unusual for an incurance company to sell a policy without a named beneficiary in order. A beneficiary is the reason for having a life insurance policy
People never seem to confront the person doing the questionable behavior directly.
If she claims it's for final expenses, point out to her that her POA expires at your mom's death, so she's not doing it correctly. Both of you (if you're the only heirs) should be on the policy as beneficiaries.
If she doesn't agree to do that, then I'd contact an attorney or the insurance company to see if she's done something illegal.
Get a lawyer
Honestly, I never told my brother or sister that she did this nor did my Mom tell them that I know of. Neither my brother or sister ever asked because neither of them wanted to "get involved" with handling all the paperwork of settling an estate and all the details involved. They were thrilled they didn't have to do it and they trusted me.
Therefore, when I received those beneficiary proceeds checks, I just put them into my Mom's checking account (which was jointly owned by me and her) and I kept a meticulous accounting of every check I wrote for estate expenses. When we discussed me being the only beneficiary on her life insurance accounts, I told Mom it would make life easier for me not to deal with running around after my brother and sister to get $$ from them for estate expenses. She agreed completely.
Ultimately it was a LOT of work cleaning out my parents house of 50 years worth of "stuff" and memories. Neither of my siblings helped and, honestly, it was easier for me that they didn't. They would have wanted to keep everything. I clean, washed, donated, painted, repaired and did tons of work to get the house ready for sale ~ even got my brother (who lived with her) settled into a beautiful apartment using dishes, utensils, some furniture and other things from her estate to set his apartment up. It took me over a year to do this because 6 months after my Mom died, my in-laws died within a week of each other and my husband was in the exact position as I was in with my mother. So now I had ANOTHER home of 50 years worth of stuff to clean, wash, donate, repair, etc. My husband was the sole designated beneficiary on all my in-laws accounts and investments because, he too, was the only "competent" one of his siblings. Now I had to meticulously keep track of two more estates! And theirs were WAY more involved than my Mom's. I was retired but my husband was and is still working full time, so the majority of the paperwork and home details were handled by me.
Being competent can be a curse! LOL
Given I cannot imagine such a thing I can only say that your Sister is currently acting as POA for a mom who isn't competent. She is under no obligation to share anything about what she is doing with anyone other than the COURTS if the courts have any questions. A POA must keep meticulous records. Of all actions. If you suspect fraud you should first tell your sister you are concerned she may be committing fraud and that you will be reporting her to the court, so she should get her records ready. Then you should consult an attorney with your suspicions and any evidence you have of fraudulent activity.
The attorney will ask the courts to request an accounting by the POA if there is any evidence.
You may want first to consult APS for suggestions and they may do a simple investigation. This may be enough to reassure you. It is illegal for a POA to "enrich" him or herself.
So a POAs, in my understanding, for a father, writing a check just because they need $ from their dads bank account to themselves for $800 is bad POA fiduciary duty, but writing a check for $876.54 to themselves that matches up precisely to a receipt for $876.54 from ABC Plumbing for work at Dads house is bad judgment as a POA but not exactly bad fiduciary duty. But POA better keep all those receipts & for years because should Dad run out of money and need to file a LTC Medicaid application all those checks to the POA will look like “gifting” of Dads and cause a transfer penalty and ineligiblity for Medicaid. LTC Medicaid will want all this information in a matter of days or weeks.
But back to the insurance: issue with most* life insurance policies as to its being an “asset” is that, life insurance pay beneficiary after death. So technically Sissy has NOT yet gotten a benefit from the change from 50% to 100% as mom is not dead. POA has no direct benefit yet.
BUT
To me, bigger issue I’d look into is whether or not Insurance Co or its underwriter requires the insured - your mom - to be the one to actually do the change. That it has to, HAS TO, to be mom as the owner of the policy to do the change legally. It cannot be done by others. Mom has to personally sign and be competent to do so. I’d look into that and this is something your State Dept of Insurance can get involved in as it’s insurance fraud and they take this stuff seriously.
* if this is a Whole life or a GUL and a cash build that Sissy is spending, somebody asap needs to read the fine print on the policy. She could be changing underwriting terms.
So Sissy supposedly did this to enable her to pay for funeral costs? Well did Sissy do a preneed contract with a FH? That would seal the deal that she very much wants to right now streamline after death stuff. You could contact FHs to get info on preneed stuff and give to her so to try to force her hand to buy this. Fwiw this is 100% an ok “spend down” should in the future mom need to apply for LTC Medicaid.
Are there other things? And if so just what are they?
"A primary beneficiary is a person or entity named to receive the benefit of a will, trust, insurance policy, or investment account. More than one primary beneficiary can be named, with the grantor able to direct particular percentages to each."
I called the company and my sister is listed at 100%. And if she isn’t living it he’s to rest f adult children split equally