By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
Not OVER, which implies control. But FOR, which implies a caring situation with the pts best interests in mind.
My DH is POA FOR his mother. Even so, it has about zero power since he will only do what his sibs want. He does indeed have the 'power' to move his mom to AL, but w/o the other two sibs' input he will do nothing.
He's been her POA for 30 years and has never made a decision for her, not once. I cannot imagine a scenario where he would actually 'step up' and use this power.
He's also her executor of her trust, which he WILL have to do and is not looking forward to.
Words are powerful. I was POA over my mother once she become incapacitated. there was no way anyone was going through me to harm or take advantage of her.
The other thing I hate to see is people suggesting that you can simply draw a document off the computer, have an elder sign it and a notary say, "Yeah, that's her signature, all right" and that document will satisfy a bank. NOPE.
People need to see an attorney. They need to take the time to understand their duties, and the learning curve is STEEP. I originally thought the one POA well done by an attorney would allow me to manage my bro's trust as well. That is how ignorant both he and I were of the whole thing. Back to the attorney and ANOTHER document, this time the one for the Trust.
If you think THAT is all fun, wait until tax time. Wait until you find out that what works for medicare OR IRS OR SS is not that POA. It goes on. People take this so lightly. I would never serve as POA again, other than for my partner, and I insisted that his complicated Trust have another as Trustee. k
In an estate of any amount of money at all a Bank can be your best friend. But I see people here blaming banks for protecting their client's money, as tho anyone can run in with any piece of paper and pull the funds of the parents anywhere they wish.
It's truly frustrating to me, and you just tweaked my last nerve on it, hee hee.
It is a reflection of the intent of their heart, and a misinterpretation of the fiduciary duties of a POA.
It's about time someone brought this up.
On the other end of the spectrum, there are POA's who misinterpret
their role, thinking in error, that they need to spend their own money
on their parent.
HOWEVER, and this is key, over and over again here we see siblings at war. In fact I would say 50% of them are. And I will warn people in that case, that a Fiduciary POA can be called before the court by a sibling in TWO SECONDS if they want to pay the attorney. And they had BETTER have the papers to prove their actions, or they are done, and will never be made conservator, guardian, or anything else. The state will take over in one short meet before the judge.
For my brother, who was still competent, it was also important to ME at least that I provided him with the comfort of knowing his money was well managed.
You are absolutely right that people don't keep the records. People often haven't a clue. Nor are they aware of the repercussions of a SINGLE person calling them "elder abusers" and bringing them to the court for examination.
I think the fact that so many people use the expression "having POA over" makes many elders pause when they need to do this
From a legal perspective, everyone 55 and older should assign a POA (and have a will, and an advanced directive) because without those things in place, life can be very messy for your loved ones.
When husband was appointed guardian for his mom, he ran into issues where hospital staff told him he needed a POA for his mom. We regularly had to explain that guardianship didn't need a POA. Sigh.