By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
I am new to this forum, but see it says. "Get tips, advice, and support from the Caregiver Forum."
There is only one question in my post, with additional details for context.
Can anyone offer guidance on the subject of patient access to health records at SNF/LTC facilities? An additional question might be, is anyone familiar with the Cures Act, or at least parts pertaining to patient access to health records?
Do know this:
1. Whatever information is provided will be provided to ONE person only, and that is the POA or Health Care POA.
2. It is unlikely that you will get near "real time" updates from any facility. That is you will not have a portal that will tell you exactly what is going on daily. Such a thing would be enormously expensive and prohibitive.
3. A constant "need to know" in this manner may mean that there is something underlying. I worry for the fact that facilities, like any place else DO "cherry pick". It's a fact of life. At some point, with constant disruption of family demands, the outcome is usually to suggest to the POA that the elder "may be happier somewhere else". For this reason alone, if you are overall satisfied with reputation and care of your elder I would watch how many monkey wrenches I am throwing into the circle.
4. Demanding families often, for all the reasons you can imagine, result in the elder him/herself paying a price. Is that right? No. Of course not. It's wrong. HOWEVER, human limitations often result in staff feeling quizzed, judged, unappreciated. I have never seen a good result from that.
That's just my opinion. You have not said what SPECIFICALLY is disturbing you about the care your elder is being given on a daily basis.
I would love to hear and hope you'll update and I surely do wish you the very best of luck.
1) Agreed. No problem there.
2) I believe you are correct, but only in part. There is a cost. However, the NH already has this information in their electronic health records. They simply don't enable the patient interface. This is the case for the dozen or so NHs I've investigated.
3) A patient portal could have the opposite effect- fewer inquiries from family. If your LO is not able to effectively communicate their status, changes, concerns, then a portal with the notes for the day or week could reduce inquiries. I share the same concern, but you seem to suggest a hands-off approach. I feel that's (less than) half-way to abandonment.
4) Agreed and am sensitive top that situation.
Your opinions/comments are much appreciated.
My main concern is lack of transparency & communication.
The purpose of my post was to: a) get some education around patient access to health records at SNF/LTC facilities; b) see if anyone could offer guidance around the Cures Act, as it pertains to this topic. It seems the context I provided muddied the water a bit.
You think this is a bigger issue ‘in the nursing home system’, but have you thought about changing facilities for your LO? Going to the Ombudsman is a cheap and easy way for you to take this forward for the current NH. If you see HIPPA’s time-frame rules as a “major contributor to nursing home dysfunction, patient neglect/abuse, suffering or even deaths”, you probably need to take it up politically for further legislation - perhaps after the coming election.
Kind thanks for taking the time to respond. Well, I've read parts that I thought relevant. Agreed that its certainly more expansive than PHR access. My real-time access comment is alluding the value of Patient Portals, commonly used by many, if not most people in my area. Highly useful for healthcare.
In regard to changing facilities, we are currently in one of the better facilities in our area, so count ourselves lucky. To your point, we did change from two prior facilities which were not at all good. The problem with transparency overall, and more specifically with lack of patient portals, is more systemic than facility based. In other words, the dozen or so facilities I've check do not have patient portals.
I did take the advice to contact the ombudsman again. This time referencing the Cures Act since I only recently learned of its possible requirement for NHs to enable a patient portal. Of course we are hoping that is the case. Further legislation could indeed be what's needed. Though that may not help those who need it today.
Your insights are much appreciated.
I've had discussions with two different ombudsman about PHR access. They both reference the facilities fruitless process of paper forms, snail mail, and 30 day requirement. I am hoping to confirm that the CURES Act is in-force as described. Also of interest, I recently learned the ombudsman has no enforcement power. I suspect there is still a learning curve on my end, but have found the ombudsman to be a bit of a deterrent, as likely to run interference for the facilities. I am sure others have found them more useful.