By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
That would allow his assets to last longer and keep the trust intact.
That is what I would do to ensure that he can live where he wants for the rest of his life.
Regardless, your dad's trust already exists and one thought that crossed my mind is that if you have the authority to partially distribute principle funds (in addition to just dissolving the trust), then you could have all beneficiaries sign notarized statements that they agree to gift to your dad all trust distributions that they receive when the time comes that your dad needs more than just income from the trust. Then you could distribute those funds to the beneficiaries monthly or as otherwise needed by your dad. Beneficiaries might be less tempted to keep small distributions for themselves than if they had a large distribution and periodic small tests are less risky than a single, large test. Still, even with protection of notarized statements, one or more beneficiaries could balk -- but, if you can trust the other beneficiaries to do what's right, then this could work. Best wishes.
I know this may be two different things justvwondering. My nephew has a Special Needs Irrevokable trust. As the trustee I am allowed to spend only on certain things. No housing, or utilities can be paid from it. (Telephone and cable are allowed because you don't receive help with these) When he passes, the balance reverts to Medicaid. This went thru the Court.
Disbursing the funds now creates no incentive for less than enthusiastic beneficiaries to participate in your father's care. Even if everyone's on board and in agreement about care now, when people actually start providing care and their time allocation changes, they may feel differently.
That's not an inference that your family wouldn't participate; it's a general observation.
OTOH, if the plan is for your father to remain in a facility until the end, what would be the obligations for family, other than for visiting, asset management, bill paying, etc.? Is there real property involved? When the Irrevocable Trust was entered into, was there a Bill of Sale transferring ALL assets into the Trust?
I think you'd be better off finding a better and perhaps simpler investment and dispensing vehicle, perhaps just a simple Revocable Living Trust with provisions for investments that fund your father's care until he passes, with any residue disbursed to the beneficiaries after your father has passed.
Protection from creditors is an understandable concern, especially if your father may need Medicaid in the future. I'm not clear though on what level of care he needs - is it a higher level of AL, or something else?
The creditor issue isn't one on which I feel qualified to offer suggestions; and it's not been one that I've had to deal with. My father, however, lived at home and only spent his last several weeks in Palliative, then Hospice care, so the end of life costs weren't extensive. And I had managed his funds for years so I knew what his obligations were.
ETA: sorry, I was typing as you were posting. Give me a chance to absorb the latest update!
While such a strategy might not affect your dad's Medicaid status -- since, technically, the trust owns the assets, not your dad(?) -- I do wonder what would happen if the beneficiaries aren't willing to use that money to pay for his care.
Am I missing something?
Your dad is blessed to have you looking out for him... <smile>
I am not sure why you are worrying about creditors, when he dies there probably won't be much left anyway. Personally, I wouldn't worry about it. It would be a civil matter and unless the amount is large, it will not be pursued by a creditor. That is one of the hooks that attorney's use to entice people into trusts. Actually most people in homes end up being judgement proof anyway, there is nothing to offset.
Visit a new attorney and go from there.
Sometimes sizeable law firms will have these kinds of trust specialists, but they don't always have Medicaid experience although others in the EP practice will. So a consult with another attorney in the firm may be required.
One question I have though, and that's if the 20% of your father's assets are still in his name, held jointly with anyone else, or funded into a Revocable Trust? I'm assuming the 80% in the IT are the assets which are nearly paid out?
I'm also wondering how realistic it was to plan for investments with a 8- 9%yield. That's a very specific yield range.
This is a complex situation, with a very complex trust arrangement.
In the 90's most every attorney I worked with was touting trusts for everyone. In my family we have dissolved every trust, for a myriad of reasons. Including issues with the trustees that were placed initially. One is in prison as we speak. I have restructured their investments, Wills were rewritten and new Durable POA's put in place.
Me, my husband, father and mother never had a trust, we re-evaluate our positions yearly and adjust as needed. The dissolution's were done for my other relatives, whose circumstances had changed since the 90's.