By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
One of my clients created an app (for clinics, providers and doctors) that make it easier for their patients to consider and complete an Advance Directive (including digital notary). To write their website I had to read the research they provided to me.
What I learned is that we must understand that many doctors consider most ADs to be basically worthless. The reason being the patients fill it out with an attorney and not an actual doctor. You need to make an appt with your physician and go with the AD form in hand and have a discussion. They're happy to do this if you tell them in advance this the point of the meeting. I think there's now even a billing code for this type of appointment.
Your physician can better advise you since they know what pre-existing issues you have and therefore what interventions (or not) would give you your desired wishes. Most doctors thinks most ADs are too vague and are not updated as we advance in years and then begin to have medical problems. As we age we should plan to review these documents more often and make changes that will comport with our desired care. You should certainly have yours review by an attorney and notarized properly and then handed to your medical PoA and a copy to ALL your doctors, but you should definitely fill out the AD in the presence of your doctor so you can know without a doubt that what you think you're instructing will actually result in what you are wishing for your end of life.
Do not resuscitate orders usually state in the event that the heart stops or breathing stops, do not perform CPR, do not place on mechanical ventilation, and/or do not place on mechanical circulation. People with these DNRs DO get medical treatment for their conditions including medication, IVs, fluids, tube feedings if required, oxygenation as long as it is not invasive, and other therapies. You can not arbitrarily decide to stop medical treatment.
Advanced directives usually state that is the person is in a vegetative state (coma) or unable to make decisions for themselves. These documents outline specifically the types of treatments allowed and not allowed. If it is not outlined in the document, you may consider that the treatment must be continued.
Power of attorney for medical allows the person named in the document, the representative of the patient, to decide on the types of care to be given to the patient. So anything is possible with this one. It is like giving people a blank check in regards to managing another's health.
I would like to mention hospice since it seems this is an idea you are thinking about. Hospice doesn't seek to cure disease but to provide comfort care to a person that has a terminal condition. A doctor will need to determine that patient is terminal, usually within 6 months, and will need to write a specific order for a hospice referral. In this case, most medications can be discontinued except for those that provide comfort and relieve pain.
I hope this helps clear up some misunderstanding.
At some point the priority changes from *active treatment* to *comfort care*. This line is not always obvious or even discussed. I would ask for honesty from his medical team - I've found some hint, use jargon, leave empty pauses or just pop in with nothing much to say.
If you want the truth (as they see it) ask for it. Hopefully it helps to make your own judgement of which side of the line you are on.
(((Hugs)))
To me medical intervention would be:
CPR (devastating if done correctly it will break sternum and pretty much all your ribs..if it works there is a long recovery from that)
Feeding Tubes
Ventilator
Medication does not to me equate to an intervention.
This is a discussion to have with you dad.
Ask him what exactly he does not want done. Here in Illinois and other states have different names is a POLST and it is detailed on what can be done, for how long if at all. this is the information you need.
No one likes talking about this but it is important to understand what he wants and what he believes "interventions" are.
Your other option now would be to contact Hospice and get their help. They will help ease confusion.
My mother is on hospice care and still taking diuretics, BP meds, and pretty much everything else she was taking when she wasn't on it. The difference is that now we won't rush her to the hospital if she starts to die, we treat what ails her where she is, and if it doesn't work, then she's clearly ready to go.
I don't even think Hospice takes away B/P meds. Your Dad could have a stroke that will kill him or incapacitate him where he will need even more care. It will also effect an already Dementia brain. Personally, I would not remove it. If he is on a Statin for Cholesterol, I may remove that. Statins do cause cognitive problems.
I would question his rapid decline and have him checked for a UTI or anything physical that might be causing this decline. It could be his potassium levels if on water pills. Could be Thyroid or diabetes. Labs will show any problems. Then levels can be adjusted. I don't see this being "medical intervention". For me "medical intervention means, no resuscitation, no feeding tube, or breathing tube that is the only thing keeping him alive. Not being used to get over the hump.
That's how I interpret it as well. My parents both filled out multiple pages indicating their wishes for various conditions/treatments. For some reason these were not included in the "package" with the other documentation (will, POAs, trust, etc.), but I was aware of them.
It would really refer to going to extraordinary means to keep one alive or correct a serious medical issue. No transplants, no resuscitation, ventilator, etc. Treatment for minor issues would continue, such as antibiotics for UTIs, wound care for an injury, etc.
The problem with not giving him BP meds (assuming all other checking is done, blood work to check for imbalances, urine culture for potential UTI, etc.) isn't so much a heart attack, although that in itself could be a horrible way to go, or even leave him alive but more debilitated. It is more likely going to cause a stroke, which if it doesn't kill him can leave him really disabled and miserable!
My mother was on BP meds for a long long time. We continued these after moving to MC. While it was clear she had dementia, we never did any testing to determine what "kind." It was most likely vascular, given her symptoms and progression, in addition to the high BP (tended higher than normal even on meds.) It's even possible she had some TIAs prior to showing signs of dementia - she lived alone, so no one would be there to observe her.
I didn't find out until after her stroke around Labor Day that she had been sometimes refusing the medications. Had I known this, I would have asked the pharmacist sooner about putting the contents of the capsule in ice cream or pudding. She was having trouble prior to the stroke swallowing those pills. One is time-released, so any crystals chewed wouldn't be useful, but how much chewing would there be? ANY medication would be better than none.
The stroke impacted her dominant side, swallowing and speech. She refused the EMT and I honored that. They tried PT to help strengthen her so she could still feed herself and help with pivoting (she was already in a wheelchair, mainly due to her own fear of falling.) It was only a matter of time, IMO, that she would have another by refusing the medications. Several months later, that is indeed what happened.
If at all possible, I would try to get these medications into him, even if it is via food. It won't prevent his eventual demise, but it could prevent some serious debilitation on the way.
I further stated that I wanted her to be kept comfortable with the lowest level of intervention(s) possible.
She’s still here, and I believe I did exactly what she’d have wanted.
If you’re fully informed about what he needs to be kept comfortable, and your decisions honor the request(s) he has left for himself, and made with your love and respect, it sounds as though his legal document is pretty specific.