By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
- if we sold it, 85% of the income would be mine, 15% would be attributed to her and we'd lose a lot to capital gains taxes from my 85%
- if we revoked the Living Estate, any money from the sale would be vulnerable to Medicaid look back
- if we *rented* the property (which is what we went with), the income would be considered Moms (and go toward paying her AL rent) and when she dies, the condo would be mine at market value (step up) and there would be no capital gains taxes at all. The additional income from the rental would be offset by the medical deductions she could take from the AL rent. If we have to go the Medicaid route, we'd look into a pooled income trust, but still be able to keep the condo as an income source, which would go to me when she dies.
I hope that helps somewhat.
To me, if the elder doesn't have fixed desire to return home & family really are not interested in property &/or cannot afford parents property, house needs to be sold asap AND before ever submitting Medicaid application. It will give all more flexibility as to how $ is spent down. The atty will have options to suggest (like a special needs trust that's Medicaid compliant).
The stickies with this will likely be:
- was LE an irrevocable LE? or an irrevocable LE?
My understanding is if irrevocable, then asset is a math problem for Medicaid like GuestShoppe mentioned. Please carefully review LE. This is not imo a DIY project to determine as it was eons ago. I'd get a NAELA elder law atty to do this. If revocable, medicaid probably will view house as nonexempt asset till sold (with that $ used in a spend-down) or ownership status changed (like dad has it revoke back to just his name which makes it exempt Medicaid asset but subject to Medicaid compliance & MERP).
- and does FILs state view property to be inherited via a LE to be exempt for MERP (estate recovery)? If so what paperwork needed? And if not, will heirs likely qualify for exemptions or exclusions to MERP?
- and whatever the above are, can the Sisters afford the costs on the property & for how long & without the likelihood of reimbursement?
If dad is looking at needing Medicaid in the very near future, you really need to get LE, will, assessor bills, etc and see atty asap. Also please pls make sure that the current AL will take Medicaid (AL is a waiver program for Medicaid) & if so, will the AL ensure that dad can transition from PP to Medicaid the day his $ runs out.
Another thing..... since dad did an LE, did he also do or update his will 22 years ago? Or was the plan that since an LE, no will was needed? If no will, he probably needs to get one done. I hope he is still competent & cognitive.....