By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
OCD I'm interested that you write that you don't want people to mention dementia *because* you (very properly) want your mother treated with the utmost respect. Did you intend to imply that it is only to be expected that people suffering from dementia will not be granted that respect? Would you not see that as a problem in itself? I'd rather we were all campaigning vociferously for people with dementia to be treated with as much dam' respect as anybody else.
Still, I understand your apprehension. And I can understand that, if your mother is frightened by the term, you don't want it shoved in her face. But a couple of things worry me.
The first is that you're going to find it difficult, if not impossible, to prevent your mother ever hearing the word. People are going to refer to it: not only doctors, especially those called in for consultation, but also nursing staff, technicians, other patients and their relatives. What can you do about it? Wear a t-shirt emblazoned with "We Don't Mention The D Word!"? Wouldn't it better, and in the long run a safer bet, to accustom her to it and get rid of as much of the fear and stigma as possible in the process?
The other is your being fine with your mother hearing that she has 'severe memory loss.' The reason that this worries me is not that it's euphemistic, but that it's inaccurate. Some parts of your mother's memory may be fine: how can she agree that it's severe when she can recall every detail of her wedding dress, for example? And how will that help her to understand why other parts of her brain - her spatial skills maybe, or sudden feelings of anger that she never used to experience, that kind of thing - aren't obeying her any more?
I can remember how indignant I felt the first time a medic stated it factually that my mother should be investigated for vascular dementia. I didn't actually say "How dare you Sir!" but that was how I felt. I'm not sure why it felt as though he was insulting her. I calmed down pretty quickly and thought oh, okay, so we'll deal with that then. Then last December, at the Memory Clinic, the psychiatrist delivered the 'Alzheimer's involvement' news. Oh great. So we've got vascular dementia AND Alzheimer's: any more little surprises on the way?
At the moment, my mother is still interested in what's happening. She's asking relevant questions, and sometimes recalls salient details about the condition when it affects her, but her emotional detachment is so marked I'm beginning to wonder if in itself it's a symptom. I have also stopped worrying about other people being told, including her friends and former colleagues. If they did imagine, at first, that it meant she couldn't enjoy seeing them or going out for a meal, they don't think that any longer. You can't destroy a stigma by pretending you don't carry it.
On the other hand, we are blessed with the attitude and the quality of the professionals who deal with her. They check what she wants to know before they share information with her. They explain things patiently and clearly. They are down to earth but tactful. Yes, I would say that they truly respect her as a patient. We're very lucky. I suppose it is still, too often, the norm for diagnosed sufferers to be pitied at best, and at worst written off for as speedy an end as ethics will allow.
I suppose what I'm getting at is that, though I completely sympathise with your wanting to protect your mother from other people's negative attitudes, and to avoid her being pointlessly frightened, it isn't the word that's the problem. It's the attitudes. It's the fear. They're the enemy.
Whether a patient should hear that diagnosis or not is a personal decision and on a case-by-case basis. I wish you success in protecting your mother's sensibilities.
But if your concerned about doctor's hurting your mother's feelings (did I understand correctly that this is your main concern?), than talking to doctor prior to appointment might be the way to get them to refrain from being overly blunt or negative about prognosis. Just don't be too naive yourself, and realize when something is happening with your loved one, and maybe you just don't want to acknowledge… Good luck.