By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
As a lawyer will not charge you, generally, to consult over medical malpractice, there is no reason not to pass your case past one. But here are a few things to think of. Just occasionally a "lawyer letter" will cause a hospital to "settle" a small amount in arbitration to make a case "go away" and to avoid the nuisance of having to be reported to JCAHO (Joint Commission for acreditation). Don't, imho, ever "Hire" a lawyer to sue if he will not take malpractice case on contingency, as a lawyer will sue anyone in the phone book if you would like to sue and pay him or her to do so; but you won't win. You may want to pass your injury past a lawyer just to help you feel you have done everything you can.
In general, medical malpractice suits depend on the level of actual "injury" done to the patient. If there is no lasting injury then there is no suit. Even when there is a lasting injury it must be severe, require ongoing care, and etc. There are now laws that limit recovery in malpractice, and they are set so low in terms of cash recovery that lawyers often will not take any but the worst cases where there is terrible injury to a young person who is a salary earner with dependent family and a need for ongoing care lifelong or a long period of time.
You have an underlying Congestive Heart condition, I am guessing? That would make, as others have said, it a bit more difficult to balance the enough and not too much fluid. CHF means that you either have an heart that is a "somewhat impaired pump on left of heart (shortness of breath) or on right of heart (fluid in periphery, legs and etc). Some people have both problems. The level of impairment in the heart is measured by "ejection fraction" tests. CHF is a scary word, but you can look on it as the pump simply isn't as efficient as when you were a youngster.
Some here report fluid from the IV causing the arm or hand to swell. This usually can mean that the needle has become dislodged out of the vein (from movement or some other reason) and is feeding fluid into the tissue of the hand. This usually is not dangerous, as CHF can be, though hand will need elevation until fluid is absorbed and in rare instances nerves can be damaged. So if you are hospitalized and notice this do ring the bell at once.
Good luck and hope you are feeling recovered now.
Hoping that you are now fully recovered.
Garden Artist has some good ideas on helping your hospital to prevent it with others, if possible. Good luck. This is not an easy journey.
He was set for discharge; when I arrived at the hospital I was informed by the NP that he had developed CHF and now was not ready for discharge. She surmised that he was overinfused during the pacer surgery. I was surprised she admitted that, but she wasn't at fault, and I credit her for her honesty.
He stayed another, perhaps few, more day(s); I don't remember now.
But I do remember the overinfusion issue. I was pretty mad too, and disgusted. I informed the surgeon of my dissatisfaction; I don't recall if I did anything else. So I'm writing from hindsight, on what I perhaps should have done to follow through, hoping this may be of benefit to you.
Second, as to your questions, there are several issues which would be considered by MedMal attorneys:
1. What are or were the lasting consequences? This is for potential damage assessment. As tort reform has taken place and MedMal practice evolved, attorneys have looked more to permanent incapacitation and other long term consequences. If those don't exist, the attorneys might not be able to find other experts in the field to testify, something that's been critical to prove the claims.
2. Lesser quality attorneys might take the case anyway, just to see what can be wrung from the hospital's, doctor's and anesthesiologist's MedMal insurance. They're greedy.
CAVEATS: I haven't worked in the MedMal field for years, so there may be other changes of which I'm unaware. A consultation with a MedMal attorney could offer insight into the current environment, especially in your area, as juries in some counties are more generous than in others.
3. What did the CHF cause you to experience? Anxiety, pain, discomfort, emotional distress? And how can you prove the effects of this on your life now? Do you have treating physicians who can AND will testify to this in court?
4. You can always try, get an interview with a MedMal attorney, but please don't get your hopes up. Fronting the costs for litigation, reports, etc. can become costly, and attorneys want to have a good chance of recovery before spending a lot of money for data discovery.
Third, there is another way to pursue this to try to ensure it doesn't happen again, if the hospital is a good one and has a quality administrator. Contact the hospital administrator, explain the situation, and suggest that (a) the hospital chart be reviewed to determine how and why over infusion occurred (b) what preventative measures (i.e., refresher education, counseling, etc.) will be instituted to prevent a similar occurrence, (c) that the hospital consider its liability and potential liability in such a situation and (d) that the specific individuals be counselled as to errors made and how they can be prevented in the future.
It may not bring you a feeling of restitution, but at this point that might not be available unless you have permanent damages.
I would, though, consult a cardiologist to determine if there are any other issues with your heart that should be addressed.
I can imagine how frightening and frustrating this must be, and do understand the feeling of needing to take action. I wish you luck and success in whatever option you choose.
What makes you think that your congestive heart failure was triggered by ?an IV infusion? a transfusion? around your hand surgery?
I wonder if you are possibly thinking that the problem with excess fluid in your body's tissues, which is caused by heart failure, began when you had the IV fluids. But I promise you, that won't be the case. The heart failure causes the fluid build-up, it's not the other way round.
It is true that some procedures can put a strain on the heart; but that's a different matter. What risk assessment was done prior to your hand surgery? And what do you think the surgical team did wrong?
Many medical negligence lawyers operate on a no win no fee basis, and it isn't usually difficult to get a free initial consultation with one of them. I wouldn't, though, if I were you. If you really have a case, then a reputable lawyer will negotiate compensation for you and not take excessive fees.
I'm thinking this might have been the situation with Hunner, that there already was some level of cardiac compromise, and the extra fluid was more than his/her body could handle.
And I hope your own cardiac situation remains as stable as possible. I've always enjoyed reading your responses and wouldn't want to learn that you've been sidetracked by some water!