By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
It's so sad that the VNA went private in this area, and that literally killed the agency. In retrospect, I think one of the franchises may have bought the best agency we've ever used, and deliberately allowed the service to deteriorate (which it did, drastically) to eliminate the competition.
Holiday and CWillie, your comments are amusing, and accurate! I should have asked for a search warrant!
Seriously, though, I do understand the need to examine pathways, but some take it too far. And others, such as the one from the agency I fired after about 10 days, saw it as a social opportunity - Dad and I thought she'd never leave. She was the most unprofessional nurse I'd ever encountered.
I agree that someone else need to be with the elderly person when being accessed. Elderly think they can do more than they can.
I gave the Rep a tour of the house, and she was glad that grab bars had already been installed in the main bathroom. And showed her there was a metal cabinet pantry in the basement as storage space in the kitchen was limited.
I am pretty sure the regularly scheduled day time caregivers did more digging around to help them remember where everything was, like extra bed linens, towels, paper towels, toilet paper, can goods, cereal, bread, etc. And Dad's closet and dresser. Those caregivers who were fix-it handy learned their way around Dad's workshop :)
Looking at it from the agency's point of view, though: they do need to know what sort of home environment they will be taking care of their client in, as well as where supplies are stored. But they must ask permission before they go into any rooms, and especially if they are opening closets and drawers, and they should explain what they are looking at and why.
LcG, are you able to say what happened in this instance?
The best staff we ever had was through the Visiting Nurses Assn. Private home care agencies were generally good the first time (except for one that I fired before the second week was over).
I did have trouble with two social workers, who insisted that they had to come the first week. I wouldn't let them; there were already a nurse, PT, OT and SP coming; they were the important ones.
One of the social workers insisted she needed access to financial records so SHE could assess what services to recommend. I repeatedly refused; I'd already been through assessments before and I knew what was available. She wanted to explain Medicaid; I knew Dad wasn't qualified for it. So why waste my time?
She repeatedly demanded to see Dad's financial records; I repeatedly refused. Eventually she threatened me, announcing that if APS was ever called, she would make it clear that I refused to allow her to come for a visit. Given that I already had the medical team, her threats had no merit, but she was WAY out of line.
However, I did notice that one particularly aggressive OT became too nosey. She announced that she needed to use the bathroom. Never before has that happened, but I assumed she really did need to use it. However, I was in the adjoining room and could hear, and the only thing she did was flush the toilet, apparently pretending to need to do so while checking out the bathroom. (She wasn't in there long enough to accomplish anything except snooping.)
There is a legitimate need to check bathrooms though, b/c of the fall danger. And sometimes therapists will recommend different devices for toileting - the heavy wing devices, a pole, commode, etc.
She was also aggressive in other ways. She was the only one who did what she considered a thorough assessment of the living room and bedroom, irritating both my father and me with her domineering attitude.
She advised us to turn the bed around (no easy feat), she moved one of the chairs in the living room, and dictated a list of other changes she wanted to happen. These weren't just suggestions; they were literally demands.
What she ignored even I though told her was that the bed had been in that position for over 60 years, and when my father did sleep on the opposite side (only once some time ago) as she now recommended, he wasn't used to the new configuration and fell out of bed.
And she also ignored the fact that we had positioned the chair in the living room close to the door so that he could lean on it or fall into it if he had to. Moving it meant that if he fell, instead of falling into the chair, he'd hit the side of it.
Dresser drawers were specifically left open b/c he had difficulty grasping the handles and opening the drawers.
Dad had configured the house in a way that accommodated his needs; she couldn't see that.
She strongly advised that her changes should be made even after I explained why they weren't realistic.
I should have asked for a replacement, but she had treated Dad before and was good. This time was different. Beyond that, she was a good therapist.
As to your question, I can understand that someone would want to check the arrangement of clothes in drawers, to see if they could easily be accessed. Same issue with closets. What I would also consider is if there are any areas where someone could lean against a wall, or chair, while opening drawers or closets.
But it sounds as though this person might have been a little bit aggressive or at least didn't have the foresight to explain her actions.
Was she a nurse or therapist?