By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
Currently I'm 76, still working, live with a daughter, take care of myself, health reasonably good. We sold my long-time house, and some investment properties, but money in the bank isn't making anything lately; even investing well is not magic. My kids, which include an accountant and a lawyer, are watching my assets, but hoping that my physical and mental health hang in there. Ideas, anybody???
!!!
I think it turned out okay for the elderly gentleman himself; several months later, he's now safely back in America. But perhaps more by luck than judgement? Plus investigations into the family are ongoing I gather, so I'm not actually recommending this.
If they need 24 hr care then those are you alternatives, assisted living homes and skilled nursing. Assisted living homes are economical if you do a shared room and stay under 15 bed facilities where the rates are lower. If they are not needing 24hr care try senior apartments where you can have a call bell assistance when needed and they also clean the apartment and assist with transportation via shuttle bus. Senior community housing is a great way to go and is affordable since it is based on their income. Check your local area on aging agency they will be able to assist you!
Also you can do a live in in exchange for room and board and have them help with care, cooking and cleaning for a stipend say of $1000-1200 per month thats often a good way to go just make sure they are Background checked and are safe to care for your loved one.
Best wishes!
I don't know what Veterans benefits that allow a person with income over $2205.00 per month to get Medicaid. (I read the max for Medicaid LTC is $2205. for 2017.) Does this mean their veteran's retirement is exempt? I have read about the option of a Community Group Nursing Home for Veterans. I would be curious to know more about it. Having a home doesn't normally disqualify you from Medicaid LTC, but, their income would. Does anyone know the details on this as it relates to veterans?
When people apply for Medicaid long term care or other state benefits for long term care assistance (Medicaid like programs that cover AL and MC), there is a very intensive search by the Medicaid or state representative for assets and income. Every dime is explored and it's not just handed out without qualification. They require written documentation, bank statements, deeds, insurance policies, income verification, etc. They leave no stone unturned, so, I don't think that rich people are getting this benefit. Plus, the person's financial situation is reviewed annually. And if they do qualify, all of their income goes to the facility, with a modest amount left for them to cover all of their personal expenses, like $66.00 per month.
Medicaid is not for people who just want to get LTC to have a place to live. Most medically qualify as needed medical care and assistance with their activities. So many recipients are disabled or ill.
Even with savings and retirement benefits, many seniors will not be able to afford long term care for very long. It's very expensive. And eventually those who can afford private pay, will not be able to.
I would suggest if cost is of concern, you seek out small, rural facilities. You may even wish to research average costs online to see what states have lower costs. Though no one wants to relocate, some states have significantly lower costs for LTC. In the the state of NC, some LTC facilities that are located in rural and low populated communities have costs that are much lower than large cities. Some are as much as one-third the costs of some found in larger cities.
Perhaps changes should be made so that families who take in their aging parents and arrange for in-home care receive subsidies from the government to do so.
I think it would strenghten family values rather than abandoning parents to impersonal "care-giving" institutions.
Wiling to relocate, but Mexico is too far. Thanks anyway!
25 or so years ago, when they were in their 60's they took a trip out of the country and at that time my MIL insisted that both brothers be given POA and DPOA equally, as well as put them on the deed to the house, so all four (mom, dad and the two sons) equally owned the house. My MIL witnessed huge taxes paid on a family farm years ago and thought this was the way to protect whatever happened then from happening, although it was an ill conceived plan because, when her house was sold (which it did not have to be as a home is the only PROTECTED asset) the co owners who didn't occupy the house had to pay capital gains on it. Had she let it go into the estate that would not have been the case (his dad died 6 years ago and she is 92). The reason the house WAS sold is because my BIL lives in the same small town, has said he has not prepared for his own retirement and wanted her out, into a AL asap and all of her stuff sold. He forced this issue and my husband advised against it, but nobody listened to him.
Shortly after the AL, she fell down, necessitating that she move to nursing home. If you don't know, LTC is covered by Medicare while AL is not. Mentally she is still fine and we wish that she had stayed in her own home and used her long term care insurance and other assets to pay for the help she needed so she could stay in her familiar environment. But that was not to be.
She is now 92. The doctors say that she could live to 100! She has incontinence and other 'elder' health issues, but medication is amazing these days. I think she'd rather just 'go' but that isn't up to her. She still has $150,000, still receives her pensions (those total about $2800/mo) and her husband's social security. Her expenses are about $4000/mo and she pretty much covers that with ss and pension $$.
A HUGE issue for her has always been to 'leave something' to her family. Obviously my BIL is counting on that, and he was the one who basically forced her where she is and has been holding her purse strings. The thing she has a hard time understanding is that if she ran out of money she would have EXACTLY the same care she is getting now. Nothing would change if she were to need Medicaid. And she would still have lifetime income.
Nursing homes are experts at helping one go through their money. Since she and my FIL prepared so well, we have been urging her to gift $12,000 a year to family members. Even if it were all gone, we would set aside money for her extras, like massages, hair do's, etc. But she has it in her head that she doesn't want to be 'on the dole'. I am sorry, but it makes me so upset to see her stuck in this horrible place (she won't come live in our state and insists even after she complains that it is "ok" there). She really, I don't think, gets it that she could totally run out of money and things would be exactly like they are.
I would urge you to look into a) not selling your mother's home and all of her possessions in it and b) having her gift up to the allowed limit. You need a lawyer in your/her state, but you can help her have a decent quality of life and make her money work as well as possible for her. Personally, if at all possible I would find a nice assisted living situation and help for her there if she can't stay in her home with help and also urge her to gift her family. Once she runs out of money, she still can be cared for in a nursing home until she passes away. If she has to be in a nursing home due to health complications, then gifting to her family may give her joy to see what the fruits of her labor are going to during her lifetime. And then make sure her will is in place for 'real' property, ie, her home.
If a person is suffering from memory loss or disorientation, it is the care they need the most. When my mother caught herself with Alzheimer’s, we brought her to. I think it was the best decision we ever made. Their activities of daily living supported her very much. All their facilities were just in line with our budget. I hope it will be same in your case too. It was not just a matter of money; she is receiving the best medical care and emotional support to fill her days with precious moments. They adds a special meaning to "assisted living and nursing homes".
Just keep breathing. The water will clear and you will see the way through.
But now, people are being conditioned to believe that there is no right of inheritance. If the parents build up an estate, it is just a bad break if they live long enough for the health care system not to consume it all. From the looks of things, it will not be long before the health care system becomes the sole legal heir of all estates in the USA for people who are middle class and poorer. I like this thread because it asks the question why is health care so expensive in the USA? My wish is that people would resist becoming conditioned to thinking that the heirs have no rights to an estate their parents built up, but would fight the rising costs of elder care in the USA.
If you think about it -- why does it cost so little to put a baby in childcare, while it cost an arm and a leg to put Grandmother in one?
My mom is mid 90's, could afford IL and the minimum expenses related to her home. Now she is in NH with income below her state's Medicaid income ceiling of $ 2,020.00 a month so she totally qualifies for & is on Medicaid. Her home (empty with homestead exemption) is an exempt asset under her state's Medicaid. She does not have to sell it to be on Medicaid. I've found that social services often recommend that the home be sold because they know it is likely going to be nothing but a problem for the family to deal with and a $$ tar baby in being paid in a timely manner. But it doesn't have to be sold. But someone other than mom will have to pay for all for the home.
The usual story is that mom has a home but now needs to move into LTC facility after being in the hospital with Medicare paying for the stay after a fall.Family is all dither. What to do? Where to get the money? Sell the house to pay for whatever. It can totally make sense to do so but I don't think they can be forced to sell the home in order to qualify unless it's the few exclusions I posted earlier.
Home does not have to be sold to qualify for Medicaid, but has to be under $ 500K in value (some states 750K). What matters is being under the state’s Medicaid financial ceiling for all other assets and income. The Medicaid application states that any assets are subject to MERP if they get on Medicaid. (Yes, I know 500K seems high but you'd be surprised at what property values are especially if your parents bought it in the 1950's and their taxes are frozen so they didn’t worry about it). MERP can then be done on their estate as a claim or lein depending on what your states view and laws are regarding probate.
Say they are in NH 4 years then die. Now after death, MERP can place a lien or a claim on the home through probate (this is how most states do it). So if the executor of the estate wants to transfer real property (house) to settle the will in probate the lien or claim from MERP has to be released in order to do so. But you can do your own claim against the estate for whatever expenses you paid for on the empty house but you need to let MERP know you plan to do this within the timeframe set by each state.
Remember, once they are in LTC there will be no $ to be used on the home as ALL money less personal needs of $ 30-60 a month MUST be paid to the facility. So someone will need to pay for parents house expenses. If the home still has a mortgage, this can be a lot of $$ every mo.
If you do this,. It is CRITICAL
that you keep track of every $ spent. Say you have paid tax, insurance, repairs for 4 yrs @ 8K=32K. Medicaid
paid NH, med’s, therapists, 70K over 4 yrs. House value is 90K which could net 81K max at sale.
But you let MERP know you are filing your own claim for 32K. The most MERP could get is 49K (81 – 32) but only if you did a sale quickly (fat chance) before maintenance and taxes etc continue. MERP declines to do a claim as not cost effective and gives a release to probate court. You finish out probate and get the house 100%. Happiness all around!
Some states have been aggressive with MERP. As states face $ shortfalls, MERP should increase. Imho MERP wasn’t well thought out. What are states going to do with a ton of homes with old people stuff in them that likely has a decade ++ of delayed maintenance? MERP came about 2000-2002 when housing was all a go-go. Totally different real estate conditions now.
Some states have super low MERP recovery rates. Other states are more aggressive. Imho all this is really dependent on each state's view of personal property ownership and probate laws and how the program is managed. Her state just gave out a contract to HMS (they do a lot of state's MERP), so recoup should get more aggressive. I think how it happens is very dependent on what the recovery prospect is - like MERP going after a 300K home rather than 100K home.
Her cognitive abilities really changed in 2010 or so - she probably has Lewy Body Dementia which seems to be quite different in it's run than Alz. There are a couple of others on this site who have family with LBD (and who have great insight in this type of dementia) - in some ways it's super scary because they seem just so competent and normal and then they have an episode that is so unreal but real for them. For her, the LBD episodes with hallucinations and false beliefs got to the point that she flat couldn't function in IL. Her gerontologist was also the medical director of the NH so she went from IL to NH. Bypassing AL. For us, the NH is better than a residential care home or board & care home, as her gerontologist - affiliated with a medical school - and their NP's are on-site regularly at her NH
and get the more specialized understanding of & care for her type of dementia.