By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
Because she told her bank this, the bank closed down the checking account. Evelyn has to go to bank in person to open a new one.
She's going tomorrow with her home health aid who she met for the first time in November. I've known Evelyn for 50+ years, but she trusts the aid and not me.
Go figure! It will be a relief to be shed of this crazy situation. Today I had calls texts and emails from her HCPOA, her long term care insurance company (2 different people), her next door neighbor, her attorney, and her banker.
Good riddance to this crazy situation. I hope this is final.
Does this classify as an abuse situation? The medical POA and the next door neighbor who helps Evelyn write the checks believe they are doing the right thing - despite my spelling out in writing and via several phone conversations that no matter how they see it, there are laws that are being ignored. I believe that physically Evelyn is being cared for. I am sure that she does not know she is being misled regarding the way she is paying the caregivers. She may not care about that, however, and I know the medical POA and next door neighbor are trying to persuade her to do things their way, just as they have tried to do with me. I also know that if anyone were to mention the word "abuse" a firestorm would erupt.
But seeing another attorney is also a good idea. Make that attorney aware of the potential conflict with Evelyn's attorney so there's no accidental communication between the two attorneys.
Good luck, and please let us know what the new attorney suggests. Knowing more about these abuse situations and how to handle them is always beneficial.
My point in writing that I could dump the problems back on the attorney is just that the attorney is there if needed, and I'm grateful there is a backup POA who is not another unreliable person. I have discussed this at length with the accountant and have mentioned some concerns to her banks. Yesterday I picked up the last two months of banking statements, and while I had turned on the service that prints the check images each month, it was not working, and I got a list of check numbers without the images. So, I still don't have names of all the people who are caring for her. I suppose I could contact the insurance company to get the paperwork that was submitted by the medical POA, and perhaps that is a step for Monday. I've been to all of her banks personally and gotten to know the people there, but I cannot have online access unless Evelyn approves it. One of the banks had a dormant checking account, so after considerable thinking about doing this, I asked the bank to revive the account and mail checks that I could use for bill paying - the bank would only mail checks to Evelyn's house, and it's been nearly a month, but her neighbor who sorts the mail hasn't seen the checks. I planned to use those checks to pay several outstanding bills - taxes and one from her attorney - that Evelyn hasn't wanted to pay - but that plan was thwarted too. It's been like this all along. Every step of the way I am blocked by bank rules or by Evelyn's desire to continue paying (most of) her own bills or by the people around her.
The medical POA person uses the same attorney. I am not sure how the attorney will react if I report that I see a problem with the private caregivers who have been hired by the medical POA who is also her client.
I am going to consult with an attorney where I live who is independent of this situation, and I may then consult Evelyn's attorney as you suggested.
Thank you for your thorough reading and recommendations regarding this situation.
First, as to tax fraud being considered willful misconduct...I have little real life experience with the legal side of prosecuting fraud. I've never worked for a governmental agency that has that jurisdiction, and the law firms for which I worked rarely handled white collar fraud. When they did, there was always a Chinese Wall erected around the client and the attorney and staff handling the matter.
I do recall reading on one of the legal websites I used to visit that proving fraud is more challenging than proving a physical act of criminal behavior. "Intent" is as I recall as major component.
So, and I'm just surmising here, INTENT to commit tax fraud would have to be proven to successfully bring charges against the so-called caregivers (actually, this sounds like real sham/scam, shady operation). How to prove that they knew they were committing fraud? I don't know. That's the sticky issue, i.e., proving intent. Or maybe they're just stupid.
If it were a physical issue, such as someone taking a weapon when going to see someone and then shooting that person, "intent" is more tangible.
I'm sure, however, that the IRS has in its arsenal people experienced in addressing the fraud issue. On the other hand, these so-called caregivers sound like a bunch of amateurs, and it might be hard to prove that they even know what caregiving is.
I think you need to shift focus to what's the best for your friend, recognizing that you're not in a position to ensure that that happens w/o involvement of agencies with more power than an individual.
But I'm concerned about this statement: "Good news is her attorney is named as backup POA and backup executor. So I can always dump it back on her. " I don't think that's a legitimate or reasonable approach. The attorney should be briefed on the situation, and the sooner the better.
If you "dumped" the situation back on her, do you think that's an appropriate way of ensuring care for your friend? Do you think it's fair to the attorney? Don't forget that she can resign as well, and given the situation, she could very well do it. Then Evelyn would literally be like a ship adrift in the ocean.
In addition, I think the attorney would have valid cause to look askance at your own actions for "dumping" the situation on her. The two of you need to work together.
What I would do is contact her, briefly share your concerns and ask for a meeting to discuss the (a) state of your friend's situation and affairs, and (b) professional guidance in proceeding.
It may be that she decides to bring in outside agency help, such as APS. Or she may contact the police. Both actions could be taken by you, but a referral from an attorney as well as the current proxy would make a greater impact on interventional agencies.
Have you discussed this with any of Evelyn's banks, as they would have access to see how the checks were written and to whom they were paid? If someone at the bank suspects fraud, it could contact law enforcement. The disclosure agreements I've read for bank accounts always include the right to share privileged information with legal agencies.
I'll call my 90 year old friend "Evelyn" for short hand. Evelyn's daughter was my best friend from grade school until she died 5 years ago. She lived with her mother from the time her husband booted her out for a girlfriend half his age until she died. (That is another long and multi-state story.) She was very sick when her husband of a quarter century abandoned her. After her daughter died, Evelyn asked me if I would be the executor of her estate when she died. Knowing about all the drama I'd observed, I hesitated but finally said yes.
After her daughter died and she settled her estate (not large but the cheating husband contested that will that left everything to Evelyn), Evelyn had a couple of years of relative calm, though clearly her memory was diminished, but she had a stroke last summer that put her in hospital then rehab for a few weeks. She had never really mentioned the executor role again, so I figured maybe she'd asked someone else to do that. But when her neighbor and a good friend started trying to help her find the paperwork for her long term care insurance, we contacted her attorney, who then told us that she had named me executor plus financial POA, and the other friend as HC POA. The attorney filed the paperwork with the County reg of deeds office. (The long term care company is in liquidation and isn't paying full benefits; another cautionary tale.)
Evelyn's accountant then advised me to get the POA on file with her financial institutions, which number three. That was an eye opener and took so many hours to figure out where her accounts were and what she had. After nearly two months, I had the information and the authority to sign checks at 2 of the banks, but no checks and no credit cards. I also helped get her claim approved with her long term care - but the long term care company is in liquidation, so she has reduced benefits.
Evelyn has refused to give anyone access to checks or credit cards, so several people have had out of pocket expense buying her food and supplies. She insists she is in control of her finances - and the HC POA and Evelyn's next door neighbor are not helping the problem with the way they are operating.
Evelyn had agency 24 hour care, then reduced to about ten hours a day - agency of course paid the home health aids and filed all the insurance. I talked with HC POA and Evelyn's next door neighbor who are involved (I live 80 miles away so have to travel there or do things by email and phone and by visiting banks there or where I live) because they were interested in possibly moving to private care in future, but I asked that we do this deliberately and interview people etc. and set up payroll. Suddenly they hired people under the table, and as time has gone on, they have shut me out of knowing what's happening, at same time they have friend writing checks and some are bouncing, big bank fees etc.
Evelyn's next door neighbor is helping Evelyn write checks including under the table checks to home health. Evelyn won't pay her property tax, her lawyer's bill, or her estimated income tax for 2017. The home health lead person won't reply to texts or email seeking information about how her business is set up and about taxes. She has a business name but it has no internet presence and is not on secretary of state web site. Recommended by someone's friend at church.
It's all a big mess IMO. Evelyn's accountant knows what is going on, but her lawyer doesn't.
I can see the HC POA and the next door neighbor doing exactly as was described above, trying to lay blame for anything that goes wrong on me. Like the $180 in fees her bank assessed after she bounced a check she wrote with the help of the next door neighbor.
Meanwhile I think I know where Evelyn's will is, should she suddenly die, but I'm not sure about that. So the estate could be a big mess too in the end.
Good news is her attorney is named as backup POA and backup executor. So I can always dump it back on her.
I work full time and have lost so much sleep over this, trying to be transparent and do the right thing, but it may not be worth it and perhaps I really should shred the POA letter.
So you have no access to her funds, and no authority to pay bills. How do you feel about being involved in this whole situation?
Bluntly, I can't help thinking that you're being positioned to play the "patsy" when one is needed. Your neighbor didn't ask you if you wanted this responsibility, you have no access to her funds, you're trying to do the right thing by working with her accountant yet are being challenged.
Is there anything positive about this arrangement that would encourage you to continue in it?
The situation between the health care proxy and the caregivers is unsettling. I would stay out of this, as I suspect when things go wrong and the IRS becomes involved, the blame will be shoved off on you.
If this were me, I'd summarize the reasons why this relationship is untenable:
1. You weren't consulted or asked if you were willing to be financial proxy.
2. You have no access to funds anyway.
3. Your recommendations based on conferences with her CPA are being ignored.
4. You have concerns whether the payroll issues are being handled properly.
5. You really have no role except be available for blame.
6. Therefore, you see no justification to remain involved on any level and tender your resignation, effective immediately. And don't even discuss these issues with the friend or caregivers after that.
Just to be on the safe side, before you do this, review all of the issues with which you disagree, and itemize them more than I have. Be thorough so the resignation encompasses all possibilities.
Have someone at yours or her bank notarize and witness your signature and send it to the neighbor by certified mail, return receipt requested.
And obviously keep a copy of it, as well as all the documentation you've done, so that basically you absolve yourself of responsibility for actions over which you have no control.
I would also provide a copy of your executed resignation to her bank, accountant and any other institutions with whom you've interacted.
If she begins making accusations, cut all contact with her.
I see this as a mess right now, with the possibility of becoming more of a mess as well with implications of improper authorization of funds, misuse of funds, and possible elder abuse, as it seems as this woman is losing some of her ability to manage her own finances. I would want to be as distant from this situation as I could when someone makes an accusation, and you can guess who will be blamed. Don't let them make you a martyr.
I spent a lot of time telling people HOW to go about this. Scope of control is a specialty subject for me, and I am here to tell you that it DOES NOT MATTER HOW YOUR BUSINESS IS STRUCTURED, these rules will apply uniformly regarding defining the employee's true relationship to their employer. And 9 out of 10 times, that employee is going to be a W-2 employee.
So roll the dice...when your CP 22 notice when you go to EXAMS and potentially, a full audit.
You might want to consider Mr. Andrew Puzder, the former nominee for Secretary of Labor as a textbook example of what NOT to do.
Companion/sitter -Can be considered as Statutory Non-employee and get a 1099-Misc (Box 7) IF the services are performed under a written contract providing that they will NOT be treated as employees for federal tax purposes and (I think) the payments should not be tied to the number of hours worked, but more of a fee basis.
Caregivers are specifically listed as employees for employment tax reporting purposes and are required to be issued a W-2. They are considered Statutory employees -which includes someone who works in your home. (Common law employees are those who work for a business). Reporting for caregivers is usually done with Schedule H (household) -business employers can use Form 941. IRS Publication 926 can provide more information about this. Social security & medicare taxes are withheld from wages. Those are paid to the IRS with a matching amount paid by the employer. Federal income taxes are not withheld unless requested by the employee AND the employer agrees to do it.
1099-Misc., Box 7 compensation is NOT 'Wages' or 'Other Income'. Box 7 compensation is reported on Schedule C and Form SE is used to calculate Social Security and Medicare tax liability which will be added to the total tax due on the individual's Form 1040. One-half of the SE (self-employment) tax can be deducted from gross income in the 'Adjustments....' section (at the bottom of page 1 of Form 1040).
Since IRS has added the category Companions/Sitters to the Statutory Non-employees, if the person providing the service understands they will have to pay all of their own Social security & medicare taxes and will sign the contract stating they are not employees, give them the 1099. If not, you will have to go with the Sched H.
As for 'family', I think I'd look first at considering the 'gift' amount (no gift tax return required) of $14,000 (28,000 if spouse included) before doing anything else -unless there is a tax purpose for recognizing the wage expense. There is one other ticky thing regarding 'family caregivers', but I haven't figured it out myself yet so I'll not mention it here until I get some more information.