By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
And often - almost always - someone knew, someone might have actually reported, but for whatever reason nothing gets done. In our infamous nurse Wettlaufer case people she worked with felt something was wrong years before she was exposed, I think I read that she actually confessed to a pastor - if she hadn't confessed to her therapist she might be murdering people still.
But I was interested to come across this document published online by adass.org.uk,* "A Decade Of Serious Case Reviews." It is a rare thing: intelligible, thoughtful and practical. It is a determined (if forlorn) attempt to get people to learn from mistakes and *apply* what they have learned.
What it doesn't tell you (or I don't think it does, I have read the whole thing yet) is how many serious case reviews there were each year in the whole of Adult Safeguarding; and what category of vulnerability (old age, learning difficulty, physical disability, e.g.) the subjects of them fell into. Instead, they have selected SCRs from a range of categories: you can see why, but it means they don't identify the scale of the abuses going on.
But look at that figure. 1170 recommendations.
How many of those recommendations had to be made time after time?
How many have been implemented?
Who's following up?
Anyway, here's the excerpt. You can get the whole thing online if you like; or even better spend twenty minutes on Google and find the exact equivalent for your area - I'll bet there is one.
Oh, and gloriously - in one case, a whistle-blower's desperate cry for help in writing was forwarded for action to the Manager of the care home he worked in. Brilliant.
*********************
Hull Safeguarding Adults Partnership Board
Serious Case Reviews Analysis
This document collates information gained from Serious Case Reviews [74 of them] undertaken since 2003 [to 2014], by 41 local authorities.
There are over 1170 recommendations focussing on:
Practices 28%
Reviews 19%
Accountability 13.5%
Strategy 10%
Training 9%
Joint working 8%
Systems 7%
Involvement 4%
Commendations 1.5%
The settings range from:
Own home 27%
Residential / nursing home 28%
Hospital 30%
Other 15%
SCRs are not about blame – they are about learning lessons, asking SO WHAT changed, for example what has improved outcomes; look for good and poor practice; and ensure that actions happen to prevent poor practice and improve services.
**********************
* ADASS, I now discover, rather late in the day considering for how many years I have been paying attention to the subject, is:
"the association of directors of adult social services in England. [note: these are all public sector organisations; none is commercial] We are a charity and the association aims to further the interests of people in need of social care by promoting high standards of social care services and influencing the development of social care legislation and policy. The membership is drawn from serving directors of adult social care employed by local authorities. Associate members are past directors and our wider membership includes deputy and assistant directors."
I'm imagining organising that procedure for a staff of dozens of people, some of whom will indignantly reject even the idea that they might be such disgustingly filthy people as to carry a parasite. And you have to do them all at once. It's a complicated project.
But no one among the regulators was either required or prepared to get in there and direct the operation. Why not? Do they not have the necessary legal power? Isn't this something they could legitimately pass on to the CDC?
Thank you for sharing that confession with us. I am not in the habit of receiving confessions, but I just want to say:
We are responsible for today.
Yes!
Thank you for sharing this example with us. I would like to think that I would take action and get it reported. I see so many people that need good advocates, but I know sometimes its just not possible
I try practicing using my voice. I know I have to stop worry about offending people and just do something or say something. I know saying something is not the end of it. Thinking back about my dad's care, I really believe I was too passive and too accepting. I shouldn't have been afraid to challenge the doctors and nurses.
I know we are all only human and we can't save everyone. But I hope in my heart, I am trying a little more every day to be braver about speaking up for those that can't. And continuing to fight the good fight.
I wonder if some of the same dynamic existed in this case.
I know that many years ago, when an elderly neighbor died, we alerted APS to the fact that his schizophrenic son lived in the home and was not capable of caring for himself. We were told "sorry, nothing we can do". It was only when the house became overrun with vermin, creating a public health nuisance, that the son was removed to care.
In my old suburban house, I had a garden shed the window of which looked over my neighbour's fence. I had two kittens at the time. My neighbour had a mature female cat. They had all been plagued by a bullying tom cat whose territory we lived in.
One afternoon, in passing, my neighbour said "I'm sure I saw that black cat in your shed window." "Oh really?" I replied "Goodness, he is being a nuisance."
I thought no more of it. I also didn't use the shed much, having three children under ten and therefore a neglected garden.
Months passed. Then one bright day the kids, on their school break, went to get their pushbikes from the shed - and ran screaming back into the house.
I wrapped the cat's mummified remains in an old pillow case, then (I hang my head) in a bin liner, and [whisper] put it into the garbage. I was shrivelled with shame and could not think how I could ever put this right.
Well. I couldn't put it right. I hadn't listened to what my neighbour was saying. She had never said anything further. Between us, but mostly me, I starved that poor cat to death, and I don't find it any comfort to know that I didn't hear anything and I didn't see anything and if I HAD realised it was stuck in the bloody shed then OBVIOUSLY I would have let it out. I still don't know how it got IN.
I have occasionally wondered if my neighbour could honestly have believed that I was doing it to get rid of him. Could she REALLY have thought that, and done nothing?
I don't ever not check things any more.
In the case of this poor lady I don't think we know all the facts. Maybe the daughter was mentally challenged and simply did not know who to ask for help. Perhaps mum weighed 400 lbs and the daughter simply did not know or physically could not take
care of her. Maybe Mum fell and managed to get into that chair and could never move again.
When my hip broke a passerby helped me to my feet and I managed to get back in the car and drive home. pulled into the garage managed to haul myself into the house and collapsed onto a kitchen chair and yelled for hubby. There was no way i could get up out of that chair and the EMTs carried me out to the ambulance in that chair.
All these possible circumstances may have lead the court to treat her leniently. If she loved her mother and i assume she did can you imagine what she was going through for those two years. Many people still believe they will get in trouble if they call an ambulance. it is also possible that Mum ruled the rest and forbade daughter to call for help because she was afraid of what would happen to her in the hospital.
The press loves a good story and they make the most of the gory details. i am not suggesting that this was not reported the way it was written but the truth is that there are services available in these circumstances but they vary from area to area and of course the patient's Dr has to be involved to receive services.
As far as the neighbors are concerned maybe they thought mother and daughter were a bit strange and unfriendly. perhaps they asked how Mum was doing and daughter just said that she was fine just not able to get out now.
We just don't know so should not judge. Not everyone looks out for their neighbors like Church Mouse
This I know: It is illegal to not report suspected child abuse. You don't need to have proof, or even know for yourself that happened. If you SUSPECT it, you are required by law to report it. I honestly don't know if this law applies to elderly abuse, but imo, it should.
If there is a local Adult Protective Service office, or County Welfare or Health office, I would hope that they would be responsive to a report of suspected abuse. There is probably a State office that responds to reports of nursing home abuse. The authorities would be able to launch an investigation unconstrained by HPPA; and if the situation is being properly addressed, then no harm was done by the report.
If retribution is a concern I would just contact APS, they investigate and ensure the facility that people are watching.
Let's look at the other side for a moment. Was the woman mobile. Me personally Don't want to be stuck in a wheelchair all day. They are not that comfortable. Could she sleep in a bed? My MIL chose to sleep in a lounge chair because of her hips. It said £, I am assuming this is England. Does England provide in home services? Was the mother refusing to see a doctor. I have heard it takes months to see a Specialist?
Yes, I agree, it may have been abuse. Just showing that it's not always the caregivers fault.
Is there any possibility of your just "happening" to fall into casual conversation with any family members..? So that you could shake your head in sympathy and say goodness me, perhaps if it were REPORTED TO the oncologist how RAPIDLY this is developing you'd think he could bring the appointment forward, ON REQUEST, wouldn't you...? and try not to poke them in the face or dig them too hard in the ribs.
Takes me back to watching my best friend's children's ringworm get more and more florid, while I assumed that... it's bright red and in a ring formation... what did you think it was..?
Stone me, turned out she'd had absolutely no idea and was desperately searching her house for allergens.
If you're concerned, you can always start with: "you might know about this, but I need to know that you know....."
Message from Google when I typed in serious case reviews and the name...
"Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe."
I'm sure no individuals were to blame and Lessons Have Been Learned. That's the usual conclusion.
What do you suppose the inside of that daughter's head is like right now, today? She sat and watched her mother decompose for months. Those bungalows aren't that big. Probably two bedrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, bathroom, hall all on one floor.
It's easy for us to think "why the f*** didn't you call an ambulance, dumbo?"
I'm going to look up serious case reviews and see if there was one. But I can tell you what would have happened if the daughter had rung a typical GP. She'd have been told they don't make house calls; and she wouldn't have known a) that you can argue and b) how to argue; and she wouldn't have known who else to call.
She didn't know what to do. So she didn't do anything. And the longer she didn't do anything, the more terrified she became that she didn't know what to do. And Nobody Paid Any Attention.
I would want their phone records, their bank statements. I want to know who they were in contact with for the full two years before the mother died, so you can compare before and after the leg injury and judge how hard everybody around had to work just to ignore what was happening.
If that's the case, there's no deterrent for others to avoid doing wrong since even if they're caught, they will get no jail time, just a slap on the wrist.
😟😟😟
I was in two minds about sharing this story but I'm not now.
Daily Telegraph, Wednesday 25th April 2018
Headline: Woman died after daughter left her in chair for up to a year.
An elderly woman died after her own daughter left her sitting in a chair for up to a year in a house they shared.
Linda Farr, 68, failed to get medical help for Doreen Shufflebotham, 86, who suffered from a string of serious health issues.
A court heard how medical experts estimated the pensioner had not moved from her chair for between eight and 12 months before her death on Sept 6 2016.
Ms Shufflebotham suffered with a catalogue of injuries including a fracture and infection of the femur, a pulmonary embolism, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis as well as acute bacterial meningitis.
Farr was arrested three days after her mother's death at the £300,000 bungalow they shared in Fenton, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs. She was charged with gross negligence manslaughter and pleaded guilty at Stafford Crown Court in March.
However, at the same court she avoided jail yesterday and was instead handed a 20-month prison sentence, suspended for two years.
Following the hearing, Detective Inspector Dan Ison, of Staffordshire Police, said: "It is very upsetting to hear the extent of negligence in this case. Doreen's injuries were incredibly severe and she must have experienced terrible pain in her last few months as she became increasingly ill.
"This was a very traumatic experience for our investigating officers and I would like to praise their professionalism in the face of horrific injuries and conditions.
"I hope this raises awareness in others that appropriate medical advice should always be sought, especially if an elderly person is involved."
Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent both have form when it comes to health scandals. Both authorities, I am sure, will have promised the public that "lessons have been learned."
Apparently not.
In eight months...
How many people noticed that Ms Shufflebotham wasn't around as usual and either didn't ask or didn't ask twice?
How many people called at the house? - can you imagine the *smell*?
How many people talked to Linda Farr and asked how she was getting on?
How many people, I'm getting at, decided it wasn't any of their business?
Much easier to blame the daughter. Then we can feel even better about ourselves by being compassionate to the daughter and acknowledging how much strain she was under.
That woman rotted to death over months, but oh well. You can't interfere, can you.
This story is extreme, obviously. But this and things like it happen day in, day out, year in, year out and yet we NEVER learn.
SEE SOMETHING. SAY SOMETHING.