By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or
[email protected] to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
My personal situation occurred to my family over a period of about 5 years. In the final years of her life, my mother, who suffered from dementia, fell victim to financial abuse by the very nursing home caregivers we had trusted to keep her safe and comfortable. The corrupt nursing facility in Hackettstown, NJ put her in touch with two completely shameless and unethical local attorneys who manipulated her and bilked her out of hundreds of thousands of dollars and a large portion of her estate. We (my husband and I - as I am an only child) fought hard to stop them using our own personal savings, but they had powerful connections. We had made a deathbed promise to my father in 1988 to care for my Italian-born mother, who was naïve to begin with even before the dementia set in. My petition with the county court for legal guardianship as her only family went nowhere, and my family was unsure where to turn then and even now, when the system is so irreparably broken. The last few years of my mother’s life were fraught with watching these attorneys separate her completely from her family, until they fought for, and won legal guardianship, only 22 days before her death. She died alone in the new nursing home they moved her to (unbeknownst to us), having fallen from her bed, completely unaware, isolated and alienated from her close family. My hope in telling my story is that I can connect with others who are facing the same type of unimaginable situation with their loved ones. There are unscrupulous people who prey on the elderly, and I would love to help at least one person or family avoid the same heartache we fought to keep happening from my mother. We hope to go public with my story soon, but it takes a long time to find the right people in the media. We won’t give up though.
Do you know, his widow is still disputing his guilt (he hanged himself in prison, after conviction) and is still publicly lamenting her loss of financial security and status? The ingratitude of all those he served with such dedication?
And, mainly, he did. He was a very popular GP, with lots of satisfied customers. Just the one teensy tiny flaw of being an avaricious psychopath on the side.
It isn't that I don't have any sympathy for her - she played absolutely no part in the crimes, or in his practice as far as I know - but you'd think she'd have a bit more tact and common sense, wouldn't you.
So although there are loads and loads of instances where there have been either serious failures or more often a chain of small, cumulative failures, I'm not sure about this one. It would have taken a very defensive, forensic attitude to look at what he was doing - making house calls to well cared-for very elderly people - and work on the assumption that he was methodically bumping them off.
When people die at home, no matter how predictably, we do now get a call from the coroner checking that we don't have any questions or concerns before the death certificate gets signed off. That extra process is thanks to him.
It's only in a half-baked way, but in this as well as a lot of other areas of regulation, I'm beginning to think there are serious downsides to their being matters of policy as such at all. It's as though, if there isn't a law against it, we're helpless to see what's going on under our noses and intervene. Peter Hitchens* (a bit of a "Marmite" commentator, but always interesting and - a weakness of mine :) - has a really beautiful voice!) argues persuasively against the continual infantilisation of society. We sit around waiting for new laws or new initiatives instead of taking responsibility ourselves.
*Not to be confused with Christopher Hitchens, militant atheist and iconoclast, his brother. They do say that brothers' quarrels are the bitterest, don't they, and the two fell out spectacularly.
You raise an interesting question - what would bring someone like this to the attention of the legal system? I've read here and in a few cases experienced police response and unwillingness to become involved in family disputes, unless they're ones in which firearms or threats are involved. But that's just a generalization; I don't have much experience (thankfully) in that area.
Still, you raise an interesting point. How does society create an effective identification method of elder abuse, whether it's tricked execution of documents or outright murder?
I think there are a lot of areas that could be addressed better, including the APS service. But are these "electable" issues, i.e., are they going to get politicians elected again, which seems these days to be the primary focus as many of them aren't focused on what's best for the country.
The old lady herself didn't suffer one iota at the hands of this pair of rogues, did she? It was the daughter who was complaining!
Compare and contrast with Dr Harold Shipman.
Hmmm. Maybe if Dr Shipman had got greedy with legacies earlier on, and thereby inconvenienced more relatives, he wouldn't have been left in peace to murder quite so many elderly patients.
This is yet another sad and regrettable tale of shysters using trickery to con someone. But, my first thought in reading your last paragraph, that these two con artists weren't new to fraud, was RICO.
I haven't kept up on RICO applications but I recall reading years ago that RICO was being used and expanded beyond its original intent to address other "pattern[s] of racketeering activity".
I don't know if elder fraud affects "interstate commerce" as defined in the statute, but it might, and/or the statute might have been interpreted through case law to address that requirement. I also haven't researched specific case law interpretations of a "pattern of racketeering activity,"
Researching that would be an interesting project for the next rainy day.
Wouldn't it be heartwarming if elder law abuse was deemed by one of the appellate, if not the Supreme Court, to include documents such as Wills executed under duress or through misrepresentation? Expanding RICO to include elder law crimes (if it hasn't already) would be a big step for those who seek for their own benefit to disinherit others.
There are a few times when I wish I had gone to law school; if I had, I would want to work for one of the organizations that take on cases like this and highlight the abuse that elders suffer at the hands of greedy family members and/or "professional" scammers.